At first I thought Bitcoin was silly - geek libertarian
naïveté of using technology to escape the forces of evil called
“financial system” and “government control”. And don’t get me wrong - a platform sporting killer apps like “Drug Dealing for Dummies”, “MoneyLaundry 2.0” and the unexpected Chinese runaway success of “From China with Cash” (which has gone largely unnoticed in the US), expecting governments to keep
their hands off? Good luck with that.
I was surprised seeing an authority like Chris Dixon leading
$25M investment in Coinbase. Earlier investments in the space had been somewhat on the other end of the gravitas scale. Was I missing something?
I took the time to
dig a bit deeper into the technology and protocol, and actually agree that this
is significant and disruptive innovation. It has the potential to make money
transfers and micropayments way more secure and efficient than what is
available in US today. But then, US is also hopelessly lagging the rest of the
world in this, as in other infrastructure investments.
Both Europe and China already have national payment
gateways, through collaboration between financial institutions and the
governments. They are non-profit. Government provide regulatory, banks provide
oversight. The result is super efficient debit plastic, with fixed transaction fee of
a few cents. It also allows such “radical” ideas as direct wire transfer
between accounts in different banks, without having to write a check. To
European and Asian readers: yes, you read that right.
While visiting the Nordics I have not needed cash for years.
Plastic is accepted everywhere, at no significant cost for anyone. In the
occasion when you need to pay a friend or split a bill, a mobile banking transfer
is now as easy as sending a text. China is quickly moving in the same direction
through UnionPay, which might transform the global credit card
business.
But Bitcoin could surely solve real use cases, also outside US. Social,
digital micro-incentives in advertising and gaming is a good example. I am sure
there are many more.
Still, Bitcoin in its current form as a currency is doomed. Why? Because a currency needs stability, and stability is provided by a central bank.
Still, Bitcoin in its current form as a currency is doomed. Why? Because a currency needs stability, and stability is provided by a central bank.
To enthusiasts, the idea of having a currency with no
central bank seems to be a good thing. The argument is along the lines that it
will become more stable as central banks cannot inflate the value by printing
more money to fund government deficit.
So here’s my prediction of how Bitcoin will play out in the
current form. I believe the currency
will survive this first hype curve, supported by enthusiasts in tech community. What
will ultimately kill it as a currency is when increased transaction volume makes
it a meaningful asset class for hedge funds. With no backing or oversight, it
will be paradise for market making traders. They make money whenever there is
volatility and sufficient volume of amateur traders to crush. The resulting permanent
volatility will effectively make Bitcoin unusable as a currency.
Bitcoin could work great though if it were just
a digital payment protocol. If it was pegged to the dollar, or rather a basket of dollar,
euro, yuan and yen, it could be a serious disruption and help make financial
transactions frictionless. Digital exchanges like Coinbase could become the new
de-facto digital payment gateway. Could this be the scenario
the smart money is investing in?